🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.